Inversion parameterization

The inversion process begins with the low-frequency model, which is used to generate synthetic traces for the input partial stack. Zoeppritz equations or their approximations are used to estimate the band-limited elastic reflectivities. These model impedance values are then iteratively tweaked in such a manner that the mismatch between the modeled angle gather and the real angle gather is minimized in a least squares sense. The inversion process is based on three assumptions as stated below:

  • The linearized approximation for reflectivity holds.

  • PP and PS reflectivity as a function of angle can be given a set of linearized equations.

  • The back-ground trend can be described by a linear relationship between the logarithm of P- impedance and logarithm of both S-impedance and density.

Using these assumptions as well as Castagna’s and Gardner’s empirical equations, Fatti’s equation is used to invert multiple partial-offset or angle sub-stacks simultaneously without first estimating the P- and S-reflectivities from pre-stack seismic data and then transforming them to impedance.

Quite often when dealing with complex geology of unconventional shale resource plays where multi-zones need to be inverted simultaneously, the assumption mentioned above gets violated. A key question that needs to be answered is which back ground trend should be considered in the inversion. Would a trend be adequate for defining the background trend where multi trends exist in the zone of interest as shown below for a dataset from the Delaware Basin?

Untitled-23a.png

Lithological trend analysis in terms of crossplots to be used in impedance inversion in different litho-intervals, (a) Bell Canyon to Mississippian, (b) Bell Canyon to Bone Spring, (c) Bone Springs to Top Wolfcamp, and (d) Top Wolfcamp to Mississippian, (e) the different trends overlaid on one crossplot [purple line for trend in (d), red line for trend in a, blue for (c) and green for (b)].


This significant observation suggests us to not carry out simultaneous inversion in a large time window using a single average rock physics or facies trend. we therefore would recommend to carry out simultaneous impedance inversion in individual litho-units, comprising BoneSpring to Top Wolfcamp, Top Wolfcamp to Mississippian, and merge these impedance intervals into a composite volume. So, the simultaneous inversion may not be directly applicable. Consequently, it is essential to modify our simultaneous impedance inversion procedure.

References

  • Chopra, S., R. K. Sharma, and J. Keay, 2019, Efforts at effective reservoir characterization of Bone Spring and Wolfcamp formations in the Delaware Basin – a case study, presented at SEG Convention, held at San Antonio, in September.

Previous
Previous

Robust low frequency model